Abtin Yeganeh comments on the Renters’ Rights Bill capping up-front payments for renters

Posted on: January 13th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Director and Head of Property Litigation Abtin Yeganeh comments on a new provision of the Renters’ Rights Bill making it illegal to ask tenants to pay more than one month’s rent plus a six-week deposit up front.

Abtin’s comments were published in Metro, 10 January 2025, and can be found here.

Will the new legislation work?

So, why have landlords been allowed to ask for such vast amounts upfront until now?

As Abtin Yeganeh, Director and Head of Real Estate Disputes at Lawrence Stephens tells Metro, landlords often use these hefty deposits for peace of mind when, for example, tenants might not have a UK-based guarantor.

‘In order to tackle issues of bad credit and/or renting to overseas individuals, landlords often seek rent in advance as additional financial security. This can amount to six months’ rent in advance,’ Abtin details.

But as he believes, we’ll have to wait and see how it pans out – and whether landlords listen to the details of enforcement.

‘The outcome of these reforms is that tenants should, in theory, have more options when it comes to securing rental properties as they will not have to compete with prospective tenants who can pay a lump sum in advance. 

‘However, given that landlords have a choice as to who they want to take on as a tenant, it remains to be seen whether the proposed changes have the desired effect.’

For more information on our Real Estate Disputes services, please click here

Lawrence Stephens expands its Real Estate Disputes team with appointment of Senior Associate Roberto Francis

Posted on: January 6th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Leading dispute resolution firm, Lawrence Stephens, is pleased to announce the appointment of Roberto Francis as Senior Associate to its Real Estate Disputes team.

Roberto joins the firm with extensive experience acting for bridging and alternative lenders with a primary focus on secured and unsecured recoveries, which includes but is not limited to possession claims, receivership, insolvency and professional negligence.

Head of Real Estate Disputes, Abtin Yeganeh said “We’re delighted to welcome Roberto to our team. We’re certain that the breadth of his experience will enhance our service offering and enable us to continue delivering commercially focused, marketing-leading legal advice.”

Abtin Yeganeh comments on landlord-imposed work from home bans in The Independent

Posted on: July 8th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

Senior Associate, Abtin Yeganeh, comments on landlords banning their tenants from working from home, as well as tenants’ protections in this area, in The Independent.

Abtin’s comments were published in The Independent, 07 July 2024.

“As a general rule, a landlord cannot stop a tenant from working from home as it would interfere with a tenant’s statutory right to quiet enjoyment of their property. The position is somewhat more complicated where a tenant seeks to run a business from their rental property. With that said, whilst landlords can seek to exclude a tenant’s right to work from home, The Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 (subject to several exclusions) provides that landlords cannot unreasonably refuse a tenant’s request to do so.”  

Andrew Conway explores eviction statistics in Property Industry Eye and Property Investor News

Posted on: May 19th, 2023 by AlexT

Senior Director Andrew Conway discusses how recent eviction and repossession figures do not tell the full story, and explores the impact of the pandemic on landlord-tenant disputes.

Andrew’s article was published in Property Investor News, 1 March 2023, and Property Industry Eye, 19 May 2023.

Earlier this month, the government released statistics for mortgage and landlord repossessions from October to December 2022. The Guardian chose to sum up that announcement with the headline ‘Rental evictions in England and Wales surge by 98% in a year’, implying that England and Wales are in the midst of a rocketing homelessness crisis.

Of course, these figures must be viewed in the context of long-term trends rather than selectively compared to anomalous, post-pandemic data. Readers will recall the temporary restrictions which the government imposed on evictions (and commercial forfeiture) during the pandemic. Repossessions were always going to surge once those restrictions came to an end. Interestingly, however, they still have not reached pre-pandemic levels.

So, while it is true that the final quarter of 2022 did show a near doubling of evictions compared to the same period of 2021, with 5,409 reported repossessions, the figure was still fifty percent lower than the peak in 2014/2015, when there were between 10,000 and 11,000 every quarter.

In the decade before the pandemic moratorium on evictions, there was never a quarter in which fewer than 6,000 evictions were recorded. This suggests that the situation for private renters is, in fact, improving in terms of protections offered to tenants. That only 5,409 evictions were reported is even more remarkable when set against the backdrop of a cost-of-living crisis and surging inflation. Landlords, whose mortgage repayments have in many cases soared in tandem with rising interest rates, have seemingly not been forced to sell their properties in droves; had they been, evictions would have been expected to be far higher than their present rate.

At the same time, tenants – who have been faced with massive price rises in energy bills, food and other basic needs – appear to have defaulted on their rent at a lower rate than many had predicted, resulting in the relatively low number of evictions reported. Without seeking to trivialise the gravity of any forced eviction, that the figures have remained below pre-pandemic levels should be seen in a far more positive light than portrayed in many sections of the press and political arenas. Similarly, the fact that the figures have not climbed above pre-Covid rates, despite the significant backlog in the Courts caused by the nine-month moratorium, offers even more hope that the private rental sector is improving for renters and landlords alike.

The same is true when analysing the MoJ’s mortgage repossession figures, which – despite also climbing year-on-year in the last quarter of 2022 – remain comfortably below pre-pandemic rates. Again, rising interest rates have had a serious impact on borrowers’ abilities to repay their mortgages, at the same time as they already feel the squeeze from the ever-rising cost of living. However, the relatively low number of mortgage repossessions implies that borrowers have been able to weather the storm better than expected throughout the inflationary crisis and suggests that lenders are taking a more responsible and empathetic attitude towards enforcement.

And do spare a thought for commercial landlords, not all of whom are the ‘fat cats’ that certain sectors of the press would have readers believe. They too have had a rough ride over the past few years, particularly as a result of the pandemic. The enforced move to working from home saw a collapse in footfall in city centres, impacting all businesses reliant on the physical presence of consumers, and consequently affecting their landlords, who faced a wave of rental defaults as a result. Landlords were also bound by onerous government restrictions on commercial evictions (forfeiture) and, as a result, had no choice but to allow tenants to carry on renting premises that they weren’t paying for, despite their contractual obligations.

Of course, while some tenants did not pay rent for wholly understandable and unavoidable reasons, forced into default through no fault of their own in the wake of the economic collapse sweeping the country, others such as large retailers with significant online presences and whose turnovers were largely unaffected by the pandemic, took advantage of the restrictions and simply chose not to pay their rent, even though they could afford to.

While many businesses were able to take advantage of emergency measures introduced by the government, including the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (furlough) and Coronavirus Business Interruption Loan Scheme, landlords were left largely to fend for themselves.

Whatever your viewpoint, it’s clear that landlords and tenants across the property spectrum have both suffered as a consequence of the pandemic and this has impacted families and businesses alike. While it may be fashionable in certain quarters to apply a reductive ‘landlords bad, tenants good’ stance towards any property-related story, often it pays to delve beneath the headlines, and take a more nuanced view of the situation. Landlords and tenants are both deserving of protection from the current socio-economic situation and focusing on one at the expense of the other does no good for either in the long run.

Abtin Yeganeh comments on the Renters’ Reform Bill in IFA Magazine and Housing Today

Posted on: May 17th, 2023 by AlexT

Senior Associate Abtin Yeganeh discusses the impact of the Renters’ Reform Bill on no-fault evictions, in IFA Magazine and Housing Today.

Abtin’s comments were published in IFA Magazine and Housing Today, 17 May 2023.

“The Renters’ Reform Bill will be welcomed by the majority of UK tenants who, at times, feel there is a degree of uncertainty surrounding their occupation due to ‘no-fault evictions’.

“Currently, landlords can evict their tenants without cause at the end of the fixed term of the tenancy. The Renters’ Reform Bill proposes to abolish this.

“No-fault evictions can be particularly concerning for families with young children in school due to the disruption it causes when an eviction occurs during term time.

“To date, no-fault evictions have provided landlords with security, as they know they can obtain possession at the end of the tenancy without cause. The abolishment of no-fault evictions may, therefore, be a cause for concern for landlords. However, the Bill will reform the grounds of possession under Ground 8 of the Housing Act 1988. New grounds will be introduced to address repeated serious arrears, and situations where possession is required to allow the landlord to sell a property or for the landlord and/or family members to occupy the property.

“In addition, the Bill will require landlords to meet the Decent Homes Standard, ensuring that homes are well maintained and do not pose a danger to tenants, which currently only applies to the Social Housing sector.

“The Renters’ Reform Bill should strike a balance between the rights of tenants and security for landlords.”

Andrew Conway comments on Twitter’s rent dispute at their London HQ in The Next Web

Posted on: January 27th, 2023 by Natasha Cox

Asked about the possible motivations behind Twitter’s non-payment of rent with reference to a recent article reporting on it, Andrew comments: “Twitter is clearly looking to cut costs, so this must be the primary motivation. The article says that Twitter has abandoned its offices near Piccadilly Circus so, presumably, there’s no intention to re-occupy (or negotiate better terms).

“However, unless the landlord forfeits the lease (that is, taking back the premises, so it can be re-let to other tenants) or agrees to accept a formal surrender of the lease, Twitter will remain liable to pay the rent for the remainder of the term of the lease. Surrender/forfeiture act so as to bring the lease to an end. A tenant will be liable to pay rent (and other sums due under the lease) up the date of surrender/forfeiture but not beyond.”

Commenting on the increase in unpaid rent more broadly, Andrew explains: “during the pandemic, lots of tenants will have withheld payment of rent, primarily for cashflow purposes. The government introduced temporary measures which prevented landlords from forfeiting leases. Those restrictions came to an end on 25 March 2022.

“It also introduced measures which provided for certain rent payable by certain tenants (primarily in the leisure/hospitality sector) over a specified period to be ‘ringfenced’. Landlords and tenants were encouraged to try to agree how much of that rent would be paid (and on what terms). Absent any agreement, the matter could be referred to arbitration. However, those measure have also now come to an end.”

Regarding the potential legal ramifications of Twitter’s non-payment of rent, Andrew states: “non-payment of rent can give rise to forfeiture or Court proceedings for recovery of the arrears (as in this case). However, unless a landlord thinks that it can re-let the premises fairly easily, there would seem little point in forfeiture. A landlord will be left with empty premises on which it will have to pay business rates after three months.

“Moreover, empty premises are more susceptible to occupation by squatters. Many landlords are taking County Court to recover arrears, so that they can obtain a money judgment which they can look to enforce. Ordinarily, a landlord will have 6 years in which to enforce a money judgment.

A landlord might seek to wind-up a tenant company that fails to pay a judgment debt.  I don’t imagine that Elon Musk will allow Twitter to be wound up for failing to pay rent. However, I suspect that the tenant company in this case is a group company and liquidation won’t impact on the main trading company.

“So, save for reputational damage, there may be no risks here.”

Asked about the course of actions courts will be forced to take in these proceedings, Andrew explains: “the Court won’t take action as such. It will be for the landlord to commence proceedings and Twitter may or may not defend the claim.

“If the claim is undefended, the landlord will obtain a default judgment which it can subsequently look to enforce. If the claim is defended, it probably won’t be heard for at least 18 months, unless the landlord makes a successful application for summary judgment on the grounds that Twitter has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim at trial.”

Finally, commenting on what this case means in the broader landscape of property law, Andrew concludes: “it’s virtually impossible to comment on this without knowing the basis of the claim and, more importantly, the grounds on which Twitter defends the claim.

“That said, I can’t think of any basis on which Twitter might successfully defend any claim for payment of rent arrears, so I don’t imagine this case will be ground-breaking. It’s newsworthy simply because of who the tenant is.”

Andrew’s comments were published in The Next Web, 27 January 2023.