Search and find what you need faster.

Matt Green explores the tracing and recovery of stolen cryptoassets in FTAdviser

Posted on: August 28th, 2024 by Hugh Dineen-Lees

Matt Green explores the tracing and recovery of stolen cryptoassets in FTAdviser

Director and Head of Blockchain and Digital Assets and Technology Disputes, Matt Green, explores the challenges of tracing stolen crypto and discusses how the recovery of digital assets is a real, established and carefully considered process.

Matt’s article was published in FTAdviser, 27 August 2024, and can be found here.

Recently, an American law firm asked for strategic advice on a multi-million-dollar crypto recovery case. Their plan was to use securities laws which required the scammers’ genuine identities from the outset. The list of defendants was endless- bogus usernames, individuals across the globe using VPNs, spurious connections based on social media. It was clear- not everyone is familiar with the alternative method- follow the money and the ghosts materialise.

According to the Chainalyasis 2024 Crypto Crime Report[1], revenue from different species of crime, including romance/ pig-butchering scams jumped from $5.9billion 2022 to $6.5billion in 2023. Similarly, Immunefi’s Crypto Losses in Q2 2024 report[2] details a 112% rise in hacks and scams compared with the previous year. Although crypto-assets are at play in these cases, to quote Aidan Larkin of Asset Reality, Ari Redbord of TRM Labs, and Nick Furneaux of both, “there is no such thing as crypto crime”. Instead, if we treat it like any other crime, we remove the inertia, and can start the recovery process.

For many, the hope of recovery dies on the pretence the assets disappear into the ether, bad actors are sophisticated masked hackers in faraway lands, that processes for recovery lack maturity or that authorities have no appetite. In the clearest terms, recovery of crypto-assets, or their equivalent monetary (fiat) value is a very real, established and carefully considered process.

However, often with crypto-assets, hackers and fraudsters operate in increasingly sophisticated ways.

Examples Of Hacks And Scams

In 2019, a Canadian hospital was hit with a ransomware attack demanding $1,200,000 to recover the data- computer screens read: “No free decryption software is available on the web… You have to make the payment in Bitcoins”. Here, my task was to help trace the Bitcoin paid using blockchain analytics tools and prepare novel Court procedures to freeze funds. This now seminal case AA v Persons Unknown, set the precedent that “a crypto asset such as Bitcoin is property” – the genesis of all crypto-asset recovery cases.

Over the past few years, I have acted on matters involving a North-Korean sponsored $100million hack at a major crypto exchange, scams in which the perpetrators utilise dating apps  (which includes blackmail after sending explicit photos), as well as fake investment platforms promoted via forums like Reddit which promise lucrative returns, falling apart when the return of capital and profits are refused until further withholding taxes (not a real thing here) are paid, usually via bank transfer. A contact of mine once met with Disney executives to pitch a Web3 gaming product, only to immediately receive a convincing phishing email offering a contract, and which led to the complete drain of his crypto-wallet. Another attended a gaming event showcasing facial-recognition technology, which was later exploited to side-line iPhone biometrics safeguards leading to loss of significant crypto-assets. 

Most heartbreakingly, my client lost her husband following a heart attack and was manipulated by an individual in a Facebook group called “I Miss My Husband” into transferring over £500,000 worth of Tether (a stable coin designed to hold value to the US dollar) to a fraudster. Funds were traced to individuals in South East Asia, with certain physical addresses including a human organ harvesting facility in Myanmar, which resulted recovery of funds. This is not merely naivety – rather, these are highly sophisticated scams that prey on emotions, utilise data that is designed to instil trust, or by virtue of a small mistake, like phishing.

All too often, it seems there is no recourse for victims. However, it is not only possible but in fact a real and effective process.

Tracing Shadows

The first step is to instruct investigators who utilise blockchain analytics software to trace the funds. Where a victim has paid a threat actor (the thief/ scammer) in cryptocurrency, there will be an immutable public record of the transaction including the blockchain address receiving the funds, and a transaction identifier. Some might point to issues in tracing, like mixing services which seek to obfuscate the movement of funds. The trend leans to shutting these down these facilities- consider the now sanctioned Tornado Cash. Also mixing software can largely be undone by unmixing software, subject to the obfuscation processes and technology available. However, in any event, it must be remembered that the focus here is not on the who, but on the assets themselves, their movement and their whereabouts.

Like those examples given above, organised criminal gangs (OCGs) use crypto-assets to extract funds from victims, then convert into fiat money as part of the laundering process. They utilise cryptocurrency exchanges, which convert those gains into local currencies, at the demand of their money mule customers. Investigators can see that the funds moved from the threat actor’s address to several other addresses and landed at an exchange. The exchange is then put on notice that it has the proceeds of crime, and requests are made about its customers’ identities, usually provided subject to a Court Order.

Helpful Ghosts

Importantly, substantive claims and injunctive relief (orders to freeze assets) can be obtained against a hypothetical category called Persons Unknown (PU). In doing so, we can use ghosts to our advantage. In this instance, there are usually two: PU who committed the act, being the threat actor (D1) and PU who received the proceeds of the misappropriated funds, being the customer of the exchange (D2). D2 is the target and exchanges can provide identifying data taken during the onboarding processes (anti-money laundering and counterterrorism financing checks) including passport information and email addresses. Even questionable information (I have seen 123[expletive]@protonmail.com), is useful. Vitally, this identifying data allows D2 to be served with the claim and kick starts the formal process.  

Role Of Crypto Exchanges

Despite mixed reputations, crypto-exchanges are often open to helping victims of fraud, namely because it builds sector confidence, improves their reputation and avoids time-consuming and costly legal proceedings. However, there are instances where exchanges are registered offshore, claim to be decentralised, or simply fail to reply to requests. Debate reigns on whether crypto exchanges owe a duty to consumers where they are on notice of fraud and allow a withdrawal, and a formal duty may mitigate risks in the future and compel exchanges to act. In any event, market pressures ensure customers, including OCGs, are attracted to the reliability, ease and stability of trusted exchanges.

Service and Recovery

Once the individual has been identified, they then must be served with legal documents and victims can rely on the crypto-exchange’s disclosure: email and physical addresses. However, in certain instances exchanges fail to onboard customers properly and no data is available. Here, parties can still be served documents via non-fungible tokens (NFTs), a process ratified by the Courts utilising blockchain technology. In addition, information gathered via intelligence agencies, as well as published data on the dark web following a hack, or proprietary software to identify individuals, can assist, starting with very few breadcrumbs. Investigators are also able to review open-source intelligence, social media sites, those behind websites, and gather clues via geolocation of account access.

In most cases, D1 and D2 do not respond, given bad actors’ resistance to open Court procedures. This usually results in an on-paper win for victims.  

Next is getting the funds back. In the instance there are funds at the exchange, Court sanctioned processes allow for the repatriation of those funds, whether in crypto or fiat currency. In the event exact funds are not in the account, victims are often entitled to compensation on a restitutionary basis. There is usually a clear link between D1 and D2, so any funds associated with either are fair play. Intelligence plays a key role in identifying potential assets- firms like GreyList utilise big data to determine whether email addresses are registered at banks or exchanges, so more funds can be located.

Centralised Token Issuers

Importantly, in instances where there is a centralised token issuer (Tether, for example), there are alternative processes. If the funds have not reached a crypto-exchange and are instead sitting in a private address, blacklisting the address with a token issuer’s assistance can freeze assets by preventing withdrawals.

For example, in November last year US authorities worked with Tether and exchange OKX resulting in a freeze of $225m, with assets linked to a human trafficking syndicate in South East Asia. Further, Grant Thornton’s Independent Audit Report[3] of Circle Internet Financial, Inc., the issuer of USD Coin (another stable coin) notes the “ability to blacklist addresses”, stopping private wallets from transacting altogether.

These processes are available via civil routes too, usually with help from law enforcement. Through these methods, including a token burn and remint, victims can be made whole again.

Moving Forward

Quiet stoicism keeps the industry at a plateau and all instances of fraud should be reported to law enforcement. Of course, more should be done to discourage bad actors and prevent frauds altogether, but by sharing stories we can educate other potential victims and break the fraud cycle. The Law Commission has also recommended that the direction of travel should be driven by case law, so the more trodden the path, the more precedents set for recovering crypto-assets.

While the recovery of crypto-assets can often feel like chasing ghosts, in many instances those ghosts are incredibly helpful – casting a wide net to allow exchanges and token issuers to be the force for good in helping recoveries.

Lawrence Stephens completes the sale of Brampton Dental Practice to L&P Ltd

Posted on: August 13th, 2024 by Hugh Dineen-Lees

Lawrence Stephens’ Corporate team recently completed the sale of the entire share capital of Brampton Practice Limited to L&P Ltd in July 2024.

The team was led by Director and Head of Corporate and Commercial, Jeff Rubenstein with support from Solicitor, Isobel Moran and Director, Nick Marshall from the Commercial Real Estate team as well as Trainee Solicitor, Heather Ramsey.

Jeff, Director at Lawrence Stephens: “The successful conclusion of this deal reflects our team’s expertise and commitment to facilitating strategic business transitions within the dental sector. We are delighted to have supported Brampton Practice through this process and wish Mark all the best in his future plans.”

Mark Moran, Former Director of Brampton Dental Practice Limited commented: “I am deeply appreciative of the professionalism and support provided by the entire team at  Lawrence Stephens. This sale not only signifies a personal milestone for me  but also ensures the legacy of Brampton Dental Practice continues under new ownership.”

We congratulate all involved in this successful sale and look forward to the practice’s future under the guidance of L&P Ltd.

If you are a Dental practitioner thinking of selling your business please reach out to our team who have significant expertise in this sector and can guide you through this process.

Registering as a crypto asset business

Posted on: January 5th, 2024 by AlexT

Whilst crypto assets are currently generally unregulated in the UK, businesses that provide certain crypto asset services are required to register with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) – the UK’s main financial regulatory body.

For businesses operating within the crypto industry, FCA registration represents a critical compliance milestone, and has been a requirement for cryptoasset businesses operating in the UK since 10 January 2020.

If crypto assets are unregulated, why is there a requirement for FCA registration?

On 10 January 2020, the EU’s 5th Anti-Money Laundering Directive came into effect, which was implemented in the UK by way of amendments to the existing Money Laundering Regulations (MLR).

The effect of the directive being implemented was that, amongst other things, it sought to provide a legal definition of cryptocurrency. It also detailed the types of entities and business operations involving cryptoassets that would be subject to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) regulations akin to traditional financial institutions.

This directive also appointed the FCA as the supervisor of UK cryptoasset businesses under the MLR.

These regulations require that all businesses that conduct activities, by way of business that fall within its scope, to comply with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing regulations, which includes registering with the FCA.

It is important to note, however, that there is a distinction between being ‘authorised’ by the FCA and being ‘registered’. Successful registration with the FCA as a cryptoasset business shows that the business follows an appropriate level of AML and CTF measures and safeguards,  while complying with the regulations in a manner acceptable to the FCA. It also serves as a mark of credibility in what has, at times, been an industry characterised by a number of bad actors.

As such, FCA registration can enhance the reputation of the business in the eyes of potential customers. However, consumers should be aware that being registered with the FCA does not mean that they will be protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme should something go wrong.

What type of crypto asset businesses fall within the scope for registration?

Currently, the following types of crypto asset business activity would fall within the scope for registration with the FCA under regulation 14A of the MLR 2017:

  • Exchanging, or arranging or making arrangements with a view to the exchange of, cryptoassets for money or money for cryptoassets;
  • Exchanging or arranging or making arrangements with a view to the exchange of, one cryptoasset for another;
  • Operating a machine which utilises automated processes to exchange cryptoassets for money or money for cryptoassets (e.g. Crypto ATMs) and;
  • Providing services to safeguard and/or administer cryptoassets or private cryptographic keys to hold on behalf of customers in order to hold, store and transfer cryptoassets.

Registering with the FCA

Registering with the FCA is an involved process and requires significant preparation and understanding of the regulatory requirements. Once a business has determined it falls within the scope of registration, it is then necessary for them to demonstrate that the business has in place a robust financial crime control framework which is compliant with the requirements of the MLR.

This framework should encompass a comprehensive business-wide financial crime risk assessment, tailored to your business model. Essentially, this should demonstrate how a specific business could be manipulated or be used as a conduit for financial crime.

The FCA will expect businesses to identify all risks pertaining to their business model and, as perturbing as some applicants might find this process, being upfront in identifying risks will not weaken an application. Rather, the accurate and detailed identification of risks will make it more likely that the frameworks built around a business model (and in support of a business’ application) are fit for purpose.

As part of the application the business will also be required to provide clear governance structures, customer risk assessment methodologies, policies for due diligence and suspicious activity reporting, as well as financial crime prevention training procedures. Businesses are also required to appoint a Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) with relevant knowledge and experience.

The FCA will also expect to see a business plan and forecast in support of an application. This plan should include details of the business model, key individuals and responsibilities, sources of liquidity, details of the customer journey and flow of funds.

Since the Travel Rule requirement for cryptoassets came into effect on 1 September 2023, cryptoasset businesses must demonstrate compliance with this. The requirements of the Travel Rule are contained within the Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulation 2022, and require relevant businesses such as exchanges or custodian wallet providers to collect, verify and share information relating to cryptoasset transfers.

As with any application with a regulatory body, the process should not be contentious, and businesses should be aware that the FCA is not actively trying to catch them out or deny an application. A collaborative approach inevitably yields more positive feedback.

Despite this, however, the application process can be long winded and subject to delays. It is not uncommon to have different case handlers and multiple requests for information provided previously which can cause dissatisfaction with applicants.

As such, a well-prepared and presented application is inevitably more likely to succeed and so engaging with an advisor can provide valuable insights and improve the chances of a successful registration. Therefore, as the FCA itself recommends, seeking independent legal advice can be key in presenting a well prepared and informed application.

Will registering with the FCA ‘future proof’ a business?

Currently, relevant crypto asset businesses are subject to limited financial services regulation, primarily aimed at anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations. However, subject to governmental consultations, the future regulatory landscape will become more widely applicable, and the government anticipates implementing the legislation required to develop this regulatory regime in 2024.

Businesses wishing to undertake activities involving cryptoassets by way of business will, under this new regulatory environment, be required to obtain authorisation from the FCA. This is because it is intended that certain cryptoassets will be brought within the scope of the definition of ‘specified investments’ and, therefore, the activities in relation to these cryptoassets will be regulated as opposed to the cryptoassets themselves.

It is envisaged that this regulatory regime will be specific to certain types of cryptoassets depending on the regulated activity, and there will be more precise criteria set out in secondary legislation to determine whether a cryptoasset and activity is within the regulatory scope.

As well as existing regulated activities being applicable in relation to cryptoassets, there are also additional proposed activities specific to cryptoassets which will fall within the scope of future regulation, including:

  • Safeguarding and/or administration (custody) activities;
  • Issuance, payment and exchange activities;
  • Investment and risk management activities;
  • Lending, borrowing and leverage activities and;
  • Validation and governance activities.

 As such, carrying out regulated activities involving cryptoassets by way of business will require authorisation by the FCA under part 4A of the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA), and this will equally apply to firms already registered with the FCA under the MLR.

At Lawrence Stephens, our team is adept at assisting diverse businesses in harnessing the potential of cryptoassets. With our bespoke legal insights, we ensure your cryptocurrency adoption journey is seamless, safeguarded, and aligned with the developing digital finance sector.

Crypto assets for businesses

Posted on: November 1st, 2023 by AlexT

The business landscape is continually evolving, with technology being a major catalyst for fostering progress, increasing capabilities, and maintaining a competitive edge.

Among the recent innovations capturing the interest of businesses is the rise of crypto assets and the blockchain technology that underpins them. Major brands such as Microsoft and Sotheby’s, as well as independent companies from travel agencies to cafés, are increasingly adopting crypto assets and harnessing their potential, seeking to position themselves to benefit immensely from these distinctive digital assets.

What’s in it for businesses?

One of the main appeals of crypto assets is the swift and transparent payment transaction mechanism that they provide. In an age where cash payments are on a significant decline, the ability to facilitate fast, transparent and secure payments is appealing to consumers and businesses alike.

Additionally, transactions with crypto often attract fewer charges compared to traditional payment methods. Crypto assets do not require intermediaries to facilitate transactions and the elimination of these intermediaries like banks and payment gateways in favour of a decentralised verification system (in other words, the blockchain) minimises the costs associated with traditional payment processing. Also, by merit of being exclusively digital, crypto assets negate the need for physical payment infrastructures such as card machines.

An undeniable upside for businesses adopting cryptocurrency payment is virtually zero risk of chargebacks. With every transaction confirmed and immortalised on the blockchain forming a secure, tamper-proof and transparent record, they cannot be reversed. Consequently, businesses no longer need to wrestle with drawn-out, expensive chargeback processes.

Adopting crypto assets also offers a broader customer outreach. By bypassing traditional financial institutions, businesses can access the 1.7 billion unbanked population globally, as well as the 1.2 million unbanked individuals in the UK. Allowing for crypto asset payment also caters to the growing population of crypto asset enthusiasts,  granting a unique selling proposition amidst a competitive market.

Moreover, due to the borderless nature of crypto assets, such transactions do not require conventional currency conversions and can be sent to or from anyone in the world with a smart device and internet connection. This makes crypto assets an ideal form of payment for businesses that wish to expand their operations into new jurisdictions, without the usual friction points involved in optimising cross border payments.

What are the challenges for businesses?

Whilst there are a number of advantages for businesses, integrating crypto assets as a form of payment is not without its risks. One such risk comes from the fact that crypto assets are extremely volatile, and it is not unheard of to have massive fluctuations in a crypto assets value over a relatively small time frame of days and hours. This volatility can present challenges for businesses in being able to predict how much it will generate from crypto asset payments, and it can also expose the business to losses if the value of its crypto assets falls. In the same vein, it can also present opportunities for gains if there is an increase in the price action of a crypto asset.

For example, a retailer may sell an item for 0.035 Bitcoin (BTC), which at the time of writing is around £766. In the days after the sale the value Bitcoin may increase, such that 0.035 BTC is now worth £800. On the flipside, the value of BTC may decrease, such that the 0.035 BTC is now worth £735.

Another challenge is security. Whilst crypto assets are secured utilising complex cryptographic algorithms, they aren’t invincible against cyberattacks, phishing or fraudulent schemes. Thus, businesses using crypto assets need to be proactive in establishing robust cybersecurity defences and countermeasure procedures.

The developing regulatory environment around cryptocurrencies presents another challenge. As the legislative and regulatory landscape is still maturing, businesses adopting crypto assets as a form of payment may need to comply with unforeseen regulatory requirements and make an effort to stay informed of ongoing developments in this area.

However, with diligent planning and careful strategies, these challenges and risks can be substantially offset and mitigated.

What must businesses consider?

For businesses considering crypto asset integration, an effective policy and strategy should take into account the specific nature and operation of the business, its goods/services, geographical scope, and clientele. Particular consideration should be given the following points:

  • Choice of crypto assets: Given the plethora of cryptocurrencies available, it is important to consider which crypto assets in particular should be allowed to facilitate payment for the business. Important points to consider here would be the crypto assets stability, liquidity, popularity, and confirmation times.
  • Payment processing: It may be worth trying an external payment processor who can simplify the process of crypto asset acceptance, albeit at a cost. Alternatively, it is entirely possible to set up your own crypto payment processing system, but will require some technological expertise and knowledge.
  • Formulating guidelines: Businesses adopting crypto assets should have defined guidelines addressing transaction disputes, and refund mechanisms. There should also be procedures in place for handling price volatility, for example, through stablecoins or immediate fiat conversion upon receipt.
  • Continuous transaction oversight: Businesses allowing crypto asset payments will need need to be able to track, record, and report transactions for tax compliance. Crypto assets are taxable, and businesses will need to consider whether they choose to hold crypto assets on their balance sheet as an asset, or if they would rather liquidate the crypto assets to fiat upon receipt or at regular intervals.
  • Selecting an appropriate digital wallet: Considering the scale of operations, anticipated crypto holdings, and security requirements is vital when choosing a digital wallet. There are a variety of different wallets including cold wallets, hot wallets, custodial wallets, non-custodial wallets, multi-sig wallets and many other variations. It is important for businesses to choose a wallet which is compatible with their needs, and which they are confident with and able to keep secure.

How Lawrence Stephens can assist with your crypto challenges

While venturing into the world of crypto assets does bring its set of challenges and intricacies, the potential benefits are substantial. As with any business decision, prudent planning, accompanied by knowledgeable legal consultation, is key to ensure regulatory compliance and adept risk management.

At Lawrence Stephens, our team is adept at assisting diverse businesses in harnessing the potential of crypto assets. With our bespoke legal insights, we ensure your cryptocurrency adoption journey is seamless, safeguarded, and aligned with the developing digital finance sector.

Cryptoassets and taxation

Posted on: October 11th, 2023 by AlexT

For UK traders, investors and businesses dealing with crypto assets, it is important to understand the complex tax implications for this rapidly evolving sector. For many industry participants, the line between fact and fiction regarding the taxation of crypto assets is blurred, often leading to confusion.

Having clarity and understanding on the UK’s approach to the taxation of crypto assets is therefore vital for individuals and businesses to better plan their transactions and strategy, thereby optimising their tax burden.

The tax treatment of Crypto assets in the UK

The UK’s tax authority, HMRC, recognises that there are a number of different types of crypto assets, and have adopted a taxonomy that aligns closely with the FCA’s regulatory position. However, the tax treatment of crypto assets is dependent on the nature and use of the assets in question, as opposed to their classification.

To put to rest a common misconception, HMRC does not consider the buying and selling of crypto assets to be comparable to gambling. Whether a transaction can be properly characterised as gambling will be a question of fact and will instead be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Importantly, HMRC does not consider crypto assets to be currency, and therefore treats them as a traditional asset for tax purposes. Consequentially, profits made from crypto asset activities are taxable.

What taxes are applicable?

For individuals dealing with crypto assets, the two main types of tax applicable would be Capital Gains Tax (CGT) and Income Tax.

Capital Gains Tax

Capital Gains Tax is essentially a tax on the profit made when an asset that has increased in value has been sold or disposed. It is the gain that is made which tax is applied against, rather than the whole amount that it has been sold for. For example, if you bought Bitcoin at £16,000, and later sold for £25,000, the gain on which tax would be applied would be £9,000.

Disposal of crypto assets does not just include selling the crypto asset for fiat, but also trading it for another crypto asset, spending it on goods or services, or gifting it.

There is also an annual tax-free allowance, for such instances. For the 22/23 tax year, this allowance is £12,300, and for 23/24 it is £6,000. This means that gains up to the amount of the annual allowance are not subject to any CGT.

If the profits exceed this amount, then CGT will be payable on the amount above the tax-free allowance, with the rate payable depending on your taxable income.

Income tax

In some instances, crypto assets, and activities relating to them, can be treated as income in nature; for example, payment for services with crypto assets, receiving crypto assets as employee remuneration, or earning crypto assets from mining or staking activities.

In other circumstances, trading crypto assets may also be subject to income tax, especially if the trading activity is particularly frequent and regular. Again, whether an individual’s trading activity would constitute treatment as income for taxation purposes will be highly fact dependent and assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Crypto assets received by an airdrop might also be liable for income tax if the individual has taken an action in exchange for the airdrop, for example promoting or moderating the socials for a particular project.

In relation to mining or staking taxes, if the activity is professional in nature profits may be subject to income tax under trading income rules. If the activity is more casual, it would likely be subject to income tax as miscellaneous income.

If crypto assets are mined, then the amount of tax will be based on the value of the crypto asset at the time it was mined. If the mined crypto asset is later sold and its value has increased, there may also be CGT applicable on the profit made from the increase in value.

The rate of income tax payable would be dependent on the individual’s income for the particular tax year.

It is therefore important to keep detailed records of crypto asset transactions, as it is possible to reduce the gain, and therefore the tax burden, by deducting allowable costs such as transaction fees.

Cryptoasset tax treatment and businesses

For businesses engaged in crypto asset activity, the tax treatment would depend on the nature of activities and transactions. A business involved in crypto asset activity may be liable to pay a number of different taxes such as CGT, Corporation Tax, Income Tax, VAT, and Digital Services Tax. For example, if a business’s primary function is the trading of crypto assets, then profit and losses will be subject to corporation tax at the applicable rate.

The tax treatment of businesses will depend on the particular facts of its activities, and will take into account a range of factors.

Lost crypto assets

If the private key to a crypto asset wallet is lost, HMRC does not view this as a disposal of the asset. Whilst you may have lost access to the crypto assets within the wallet, you still technically own the assets.

However, in situations where there’s no realistic chance of recovering the crypto assets, it may be possible to file a negligible value claim and seek relief for a capital loss.

Gifts

Gifting crypto assets is viewed by HMRC as a disposal, and therefore will attract a tax liability in the form of CGT. In other words, you would be subject to CGT on the difference between what you originally paid for the crypto asset and its market value at the time it was gifted.

However, there are advantageous carve-outs when it comes to gifting crypto assets to your spouse or civil partner, as transfers between spouses/civil partners are not usually subject to CGT at the time of the gift.

Rather, the recipient takes on the original cost basis and will then be liable for any CGT if they later sell or dispose of the crypto assets.

Conclusion

Taxation and crypto assets can be a complex and nuanced area, with many considerations, and failure to report crypto gains or losses could lead to penalties and interest charges on unpaid tax liabilities.

It is therefore important to note that, although the nature of cryptoassets and the decentralised framework in which they operate allows for pseudonymity, HMRC has invested significant time and effort to ensure cryptoasset tax compliance.

HMRC has been known to request customer information from centralised exchanges, and also utilises technology and analytics to analyse data and transactions which can establish connections between cryptoasset wallets and transactions and the individuals behind them. 

With this in mind, it is imperative that individuals engaged in the crypto sector seek professional advice to ensure that tax liability is calculated correctly and is optimised in line with their strategy and objectives.

Asim Arshad comments on crypto regulation in CoinDesk

Posted on: October 4th, 2023 by AlexT

With many crypto firms suspending their services in the UK, Senior Associate Asim Arshad comments on the FCA regime concerning the investment of crypto assets.

Asim’s comments were published in CoinDesk, 4 October 2023, and can be found here.

“Essentially, all communications to U.K. consumers in relation to crypto assets which could be seen as an invitation or inducement to invest, must comply with the rules.”

Using crypto assets to purchase property

Posted on: September 27th, 2023 by AlexT

With the increasing adoption of crypto assets, it is inevitable that we will see a rise in interactions between this sector and more traditional asset markets, such as real estate.

An increased awareness of crypto assets, and their growing availability over the past decade have presented both individuals and enterprises with access to a risk-on environment, characterised by high risk and reward profiles. Consequently, numerous investors have experienced significant returns on their initial, sometimes modest, investments. One notable trend we have observed is the convergence of crypto wealth with the traditional real estate market, particularly in the form of crypto gains being utilised towards real estate acquisitions.

There are primarily two methods by which individuals and businesses are using crypto wealth to enter the real estate market.

The first and most common approach involves utilising the fiat proceeds from crypto gains to cover part or the whole cost of a property purchase. This approach aligns closely with established conveyancing practices.

The second approach entails the direct use of the crypto assets themselves to facilitate the property purchase. The property’s purchase price, whilst still being pegged to a fiat value, is not settled in fiat currency but rather in an agreed-upon amount of specified crypto assets.

Both approaches have their own complexities and advantages, including risk tolerance, market conditions and legal considerations.

 

Using fiat proceeds of crypto assets

The approach of using fiat proceed of crypto gains in property purchases is a method which strongly resembles established conveyance process, albeit with some nuances in the process brought on by additional financial planning and legal considerations. This is by far the most common method by which parties are utilising cryptoassets in order to purchase property.

Generally, the process will involve several key considerations.

Conversion to fiat

The first step of this process is to convert crypto assets comprising part or the entirety of a crypto assets portfolio into a fiat currency, as the British Pound Sterling.

This will usually occur through a centralised exchange and, given the volatility of the crypto markets, timing may be an important consideration.

Parties will often aim to convert their crypto assets at a peak value, so as to maximise the return into fiat. If substantial sums are being converted and off-ramped, then it is likely that it will be done in tranches and using multiple centralised exchanges to get the best rates and mitigate slippage.

It is also possible to convert cryptocurrencies into fiat currencies using OTC trades, facilitated by a specialised broker.

Banking considerations

Whilst banks and other financial institutions are undoubtedly more familiar with crypto assets than they were several years ago, it is still important to note that not all financial institutions are crypto friendly.

As such, when off-ramping substantial sums from an exchange to a bank account, it is vital to consider whether the bank in question is willing to accept the funds into the account, and buyers must be prepared for the bank to make enquiries about the source of funds in line with standard anti-money laundering and know-your-customer requirements.

Legal and tax implications

A conversion between crypto assets (e.g. Bitcoin to USDC) or a conversion from crypto assets into fiat is also likely trigger a tax liability, and crypto investors may be subject to capital gains tax or income tax, depending on the nature of the activity.

Solicitors assisting with the purchase of  property in such cases will be aware that they will be taking these fiat funds into their account in furtherance of the purchase. As such, they will have a responsibility to determine that these fiat proceeds of crypto assets activity is genuine and not illicit funds or an attempt to launder money.

In other words, the solicitor must be able to verify the source of funds – a key consideration  due to the sector specific knowledge that this requires. Before instructing solicitors with the conveyance of the intended property, potential buyers should ensure they are comfortable and able to verify source of funds coming by way of  crypto assets.

At Lawrence Stephens, our dedicated crypto asset and blockchain team within the firm works closely with our conveyancing department to be able to review and verify source of funds deriving from crypto assets activity seamlessly.

Application of the funds

Depending on how fiat funds are intended to be applied, if a cash amount is being used to cover the entire cost of the property, then standard conveyancing procedures will apply to the rest of this process.

However, if funds are intended to be used as a partial deposit, with the rest of the purchase price to be financed through a mortgage, lenders will likely require an overview of your finances including crypto assets gains.

Completion

Once the parties arrive at the completion stage, the buyer will transfer the fiat funds to their solicitors, as will the mortgage provider if applicable. The solicitors on either side will then ensure the timely transfer of funds and completion of formalities to record the transaction and change of ownership of the property.

 

Using crypto assets to purchase property

Whilst certainly a less common route to purchase property, it is also possible to utilise crypto assets themselves for a property purchase. Whilst this route to acquire property comes with additional considerations, complexities and advantages, it can often be a desirable option particularly for those with large crypto portfolios.

Agreement with seller

One of the main considerations and challenges with such an approach is finding a seller who not only has a property to sell that fits the requirements of the buyer, but is also willing to accept crypto assets as a form of payment.

Much like any other property purchase, parties will need to arrive at an agreed figure for the purchase price of the property and, even though cryptoassets will be used in the transaction, the purchase price agreed must be agreed in fiat currency. This is not just crucial for contractual clarity between the parties, but it is also important for the calculation of Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) liability, if applicable.

Agreeing the crypto asset

Both parties will also need to agree the crypto assets to be used in the transaction, and this will require due diligence on the assets involved. It may also be necessary to the current regulatory environment to ensure there are no restrictions on using the crypto assets of choice. If a particular crypto assets was regulated, for example, then strictly speaking it would technically not be permitted to deal in the same without regulatory approval.

From the seller’s perspective, they will have undoubtedly have additional considerations for the crypto assets to be used, and may likely only want to deal in a crypto assets that has sufficient liquidity.

For example, assuming the purchase price of the property is agreed in the sum of £800,000, the parties will then need to agree which crypto asset (or assets) are to comprise the purchase price. In this example, we will assume that the parties agree to transact in Bitcoin and, as of September 2023, the value of 1 Bitcoin is approximately £20,000.

Due to the volatility of crypto assets, it is not uncommon for parties to reach their own agreed upon conversion rate for the crypto assets being used. In this example, if we assume that the parties agree that the Bitcoin used for the purchase will be valued at £19,500, the buyer will have to pay the seller 41.02 Bitcoin.

Due to the nature of using crypto assets in such a transaction, separate agreements may be required that addresses the particular characteristics of these assets. For example, given the volatility of crypto assets, both parties assume a market risk until the transaction is completed. To mitigate this, specific clauses can be inserted into agreements to address scenarios where the crypto assets value changes dramatically before completion.

Specialised mechanisms or escrow type services for the actual transfer of the crypto assets would also likely need to be agreed upon and catered for in a specific agreement. In typical transactions, buyers would usually send the purchase monies to their solicitors, who would then forward it over to the seller solicitors. In a crypto transaction, alternative mechanisms would need to be utilised to ensure that the transaction occurs properly, and payment is sent and confirmed to the relevant parties so subsequent steps in the conveyance procedure can take place.

Solicitors with expertise in crypto assets transactions are crucial in such instances, to ensure legal compliance and clarity.

Post-completion formalities

After the transaction is complete, the usual formalities such as land registration will follow, and these may require special annotation to indicate the use of crypto assets in the purchase. The land registry, in the past, has recorded the sale price of property in crypto assets.

SDLT may also be applicable and will usually be calculated in relation to the value of the crypto assets on the day of completion, as evidenced by reputable data sources.

From the seller’s perspective, they will want to ensure that they can continue to securely hold and access the crypto assets or convert them into fiat, depending on their intentions. Oversight in this regard could lead to difficulties in them accessing the proceeds of the sale.

 

Conclusion

The purchase of property using the fiat proceeds of crypto assets, or crypto assets themselves is not only feasible but can also be an attractive option for both buyers and sellers.

Such transactions are accompanied by a unique set of legal considerations that require specialised knowledge and understanding of the crypto assets sector; from due diligence on the crypto assets used and their liquidity, to understanding the additional legal mechanisms required to ensure a compliant and clear transaction, the process necessitates an expert legal perspective.

Our crypto assets team is equipped with specialised knowledge in the crypto asset sector, enabling us to guide clients through each step of this innovative transaction method. If you are contemplating diving into the world of property purchases via crypto assets, we are here to assist and advise.

A brief guide to the different types of cryptoassets

Posted on: September 20th, 2023 by AlexT

It is a common misconception that the existence of crypto assets was ushered in by the arrival of Bitcoin in 2009. In reality, the concept of digital or cryptographic currencies significantly predates Bitcoin, and there were several attempts to create a digital, decentralised form of currency before Bitcoin, for example eCash and HashCash. However, whilst Bitcoin was not the first attempt at a cryptocurrency, it was the one that solved certain key issues, such as double spending and decentralisation, more effectively than its predecessors. In this sense, it was undoubtedly the cryptocurrency that propelled crypto assets into mainstream recognition.

Since the introduction of Bitcoin, the world of crypto assets has grown exponentially, and the market now consists of tens of thousands of different crypto assets, each with their own functionalities, supposed use cases, and legal implications.

Are coins the same as tokens?

From a legal and regulatory perspective, the terms coins and tokens can and are used interchangeably in relation to crypto assets, and both terms essentially have the same meaning when used in this context.

However, in crypto centric terms, Coins and Tokens have very different meanings.

Coins are usually used to refer to those crypto assets which act as native crypto assets to their own blockchain. For example, Bitcoin on the Bitcoin blockchain, or Ether on the Ethereum blockchain. Coins are usually intended to function as a digital store of value or medium of exchange.

Tokens, on the other hand, are crypto assets that operate on an existing blockchain network instead of their own. Whilst tokens can also be used in a similar fashion to coins, they are often created to fulfil different purposes to coins, for example to raise funds or give access to particular services. Some examples of tokens include Shiba Inu, Tether, and Basic Attention Token.

So, whilst most of the regulatory language in the UK refers to “tokens”, it should be remembered that this is not a reference to the crypto specific definition of a token, and is essentially used as a technologically neutral term in a legal and regulatory context.

Altcoins and memecoins

An altcoin is simply a designation given to any crypto assets which is not Bitcoin (and arguably Ether).

Many altcoins are designed to be used for a specific purpose or to address limitations and innovate upon existing blockchains. One of the first altcoins was Litecoin, which was forked (or simply put, an offshoot) from the Bitcoin blockchain, and offers faster transaction times than Bitcoin.

Memecoins are another subset of crypto assets that often originate from an internet meme or joke, yet can attract serious following and price appreciation.

Memecoins often do not aim for any specific functionality or utility, and primarily gather attention through social media, viral marketing and online community engagement. They represent a fascinating microcosm within the crypto assets world and can sometimes evolve into more refined projects with defined aims and utilities.

An example of a memecoin is Dogecoin, which experienced significant growth in a relatively short period of time, reaching a value of $0.68c at its all time high in May 2021, meaning it had a market cap of around $88 billion.

Stablecoins

Despite the name, most stablecoins are usually tokens utilising existing blockchains – another quirk of usual crypto lexicon!

One of the endemic characteristics of crypto assets is that they are extremely volatile, and while this volatility can be beneficial, it is one of the characteristics that makes crypto assets unsuitable as a medium of exchange or store of value. Stablecoins exist to address the problem of volatility by pegging their value to an external reference, for example a commodity such as gold, or a fiat currency such as the US dollar.

Whilst all stablecoins maintain their value by some external reference, there are different types of stablecoins.

Some stablecoins are said to be fiat-collateralised – in other words, they are said to be backed one-to-one by reserves of fiat currency. An example of such a stablecoin would be USDC. For every USDC token in existence, there is an equivalent amount of fiat US dollar held in reserve.

Other stablecoins are crypto-collateralised and so they are backed by a reserve of other crypto assets. They utilise smart contracts that automatically adjust the collateral to maintain a stable value. An example of one such stablecoin is DAI.

Some stablecoins are commodity-collateralised and reference the value of a physical commodity such as gold or silver and aim to maintain a peg to that value. For example, Tether Gold is said to be collateralised to gold.

There also exists stablecoins that are not backed by any collateral at all but aim to use algorithms to control their supply and demand and maintain a stable value. There has been increasing criticism of algorithmic stablecoins, particularly since the collapse of Luna and Terra USD in May 2022.

It is a noteworthy point that many jurisdictions are developing central bank digital currencies (CBDC’s) and some have already been implemented such as the eNaira in Nigeria. They are digital, similar to crypto assets, and their value tends to be fixed to their country’s fiat currency much like a stablecoin. However, CBDC’s should not be confused with crypto assets, particularly as CBDC’s are controlled by a central bank or monetary authority, while crypto assets are typically decentralised.

Governance tokens

Governance Tokens are a type of crypto asset that allows holders to vote on decisions related to a particular platform or protocol. They act as a bridge between platform creators and the community of users and allow for an element of democratisation.

Examples of governance tokens include the maker token (MKR), issued by MakerDAO. One MKR token is equivalent to one vote, and token holders vote on several issues including appointing team members and modifying fees.

Fan tokens

Fan tokens are another form of crypto asset that, in essence, represents membership of a fan club of a particular sports team, artist or celebrity. They often allow their holders to access fan membership perks such as voting on decisions, merchandise designs and rewards. They also often grant holders access to privileges such as exclusive content and ticketing privileges.

Football clubs such as FC Barcelona, Manchester City and PSG each have dedicated fan tokens.

Non-fungible tokens (NFT’s)

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are a form of crypto asset that represents ownership or proof of authenticity of a unique item or piece of content. They are best thought of as assets that have been tokenised via a blockchain, and they are inherently unique in themselves, such that they are not interchangeable.

For example, a particular ETH coin is essentially no different to another ETH coin, and so they are interchangeable on a one-to-one basis. However, comparing two NFT’s, even though they may look the same will have independent and unique characteristics.

NFT’s can be used to tokenise a wide variety of assets from art and music, to real estate and event tickets.

Popular examples of NFTs include the Bored Apes Yacht Club collection and Cryptopunks.

The legal definition of crypto assets that has been adopted in the UK includes NFTs, and this allows for them to be interpreted within the same framework as other crypto assets which are deemed to constitute property. From a regulatory perspective, an NFT can be unregulated or regulated depending on the rights and obligations that attach to the NFT.

The High Court in England has already demonstrated its forward-thinking approach by allowing the service of legal documents via NFTs. As well as highlighting the flexibility of NFTs, this also highlights the English judicial system’s openness to integrate emerging technologies into practice.

Tokenised Real-world Assets

Another growing subset of assets within crypto assets are tokenised assets that represent a share in a real-world asset, such as real estate, a luxury watch or handbag, vintage cars, and art. These usually utilise NFTs and allow for expensive assets to be broken down into smaller, easily traded units.

The legal and regulatory treatment for these can be complex and very much depend on the nature of the underlying asset which the token represents.

Conclusion

The landscape of crypto assets is diverse and ever evolving, encompassing a range of asset types, many of which fall into one or more of the above categories.

Understanding and appreciating the legal intricacies of these various assets is imperative for both individual and institutional participants in this rapidly growing sector. As a UK-based law firm with a particular specialism in crypto assets, Lawrence Stephens is uniquely positioned to provide expert guidance and innovative solutions to investors, creators and holders alike.

Please do not hesitate to contact our team who will be happy to discuss and identify your needs.

What are crypto assets and how are they regulated?

Posted on: September 14th, 2023 by AlexT

In the age of the Digital Revolution, terms such as ‘crypto assets’, ‘cryptocurrency’, ‘tokens’, and ‘blockchain’ have become increasingly common in everyday conversations, as well as in financial, technological, and legal discourse. Despite their growing presence, adoption and relevance, misconceptions and ambiguity continue to surround this novel asset class.

Perhaps these misconceptions and ambiguity can be explained by the nuances in the terminology, which often amalgamate traditional financial and technological terms.

The terms ‘crypto assets’, ‘cryptocurrency’, and ‘crypto tokens’ are often used interchangeably, yet each has its own specific implications and considerations.

Whilst ‘cryptocurrency’ is perhaps the most commonly recognised catch-all term for this group of assets, it is somewhat of a misnomer as they do not possess all of the properties of a traditional currency (also called ‘fiat currency).

Fiat currencies are typically used as a medium of exchange for goods and services. They can also be used as a store of value and as a unit of account. They are most often issued by central banks or monetary authorities.

In contrast, cryptocurrencies are not yet widely accepted as a medium of exchange, and their inherent volatility makes them unsuitable as a unit of account. Cryptocurrencies are said to be ‘decentralised’ as they are not issued by or subject to governments, central banks or monetary authorities. However, a point should be made to contrast this with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC’s), which are digital forms of fiat currency issued by central banks, and are often mentioned in the same discourse as cryptocurrencies.

For these reasons, the term ‘crypto assets’ is a more accurate catch-all term that we choose to adopt.

What are Crypto assets?

Essentially, they are digital assets that use cryptography for security, and utilise a form of distributed ledger technology, such as a blockchain, to record and store transactions. The wide definition of ‘crypto asset’ adopted in the UK also encompasses crypto assets such as NFT’s.

Blockchain is the underlying technology that enables the secure and decentralised functioning of crypto assets. A blockchain is a type of digital ledger that is distributed across a network of computers known as nodes, where no one single entity has control of the data.

Each block contains a list of transactions which are cryptographically linked to the previous block, which functions to create a secure and immutable record of transactions.

The decentralisation aspect of crypto assets is one of their most appealing design features. It means that they are not subject to governmental or monetary policy interference, nor are they susceptible to any single point of failure, and it also enables a number of use cases for crypto assets.

Popular and well-known crypto assets include Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ether, and Cardano, although there are now tens of thousands of crypto assets in existence.

Treatment of cryptoassets in the UK

As the adoption of crypto assets continues to grow, they have presented novel and unique challenges to governments, monetary bodies, and international regulators. One of the main challenges in regulating crypto assets is that they are global in nature and exist without borders. As such, different national regulators have taken inconsistent approaches towards their treatment of crypto assets, and it is very much a sector that is in a near-constant state of regulatory and legislative flux.

Crypto assets are not subject to any blanket prohibition or ban in the UK, in contrast to what has been seen in other parts of the world such as China. Rather, the UK government and regulators have openly recognised the substantial benefit and use cases of crypto assets and blockchain technology, which has made the UK a ‘friendly’ jurisdiction for start-ups and established companies alike, looking to develop, create, implement, and explore this space.

Aside from an outright ban on the marketing, distribution or sale of crypto-derivative products to retain consumers, there are no specific prohibitions on the use, purchase or trading of crypto assets in the UK.

The legal status of crypto assets in the UK is that they are treated and viewed as property. While there is continuing academic and legal discussion on this classification, which does not neatly fit with crypto assets, the view that crypto assets constitute property has been accepted several times by the High Court. This has provided much-needed legal clarity as to the status of cryptoassets, and how they are to be treated under existing laws and frameworks. This approach by the High Court has meant that England and Wales have emerged as a favourable forum for resolving crypto assets disputes, as the legal clarity provided allows for the application for well-established laws to this emerging asset class.

Are cryptoassets regulated in the UK?

The UK has positioned itself as a key participant in shaping the regulatory landscape for crypto assets, with bodies such as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) taking steps to define and further classify crypto assets.

Broadly speaking, the current FCA regulatory regime refers to crypto assets by way of a token taxonomy, which then dictate whether a cryptoasset is regulated or unregulated.

Security tokens and e-money tokens are regulated by the FCA, whereas exchange tokens and utility tokens are considered unregulated tokens.

  • Security Tokens: These are crypto assets with characteristics causing them to meet the definition of a Specified Investment as set out in the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001. An example of a security token is a crypto asset that represents shares in a company or functions as a debt instrument.

A security token essentially grants the holder financial rights, akin to a share or a bond, and crypto assets which exhibit characteristics and functions of a security token would be regulated.

  • E-money tokens: These are crypto assets which meet the definition of e-money and are subject to the Electronic Money Regulations 2011, and fall within the scope of regulation.
  • Utility Tokens: These are crypto assets which essentially act as digital coupons for the service, application or ecosystem they are associated with. They do not confer ownership rights (unlike security tokens) and nor do they represent an investment in the issuer. They are often used as a means of exchange for goods or services, or to acquire access to a particular service or application. Utility tokens are unregulated – examples include Basic Attention Token (BAT), Filecoin (FIL), and Axie Infinity (AXS).
  • Exchange Tokens: These include crypto assets that are used in a similar way to traditional fiat currency as a means of exchange, although they do not meet the criteria to be considered a currency. Similar to Utility tokens, they do not grant the holder any ownership rights or rights associated with specified investments. They are often held as speculative investments, as well as a means of exchange. Exchange tokens are unregulated, and examples include Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH).

The FCA takes a substance over form view in relation to crypto assets. In other words, if a crypto asset has the substance of a traditional financial instrument, regardless of whether it is in digital form, it will fall under the FCA’s regulatory ambit.

Crypto assets lacking the characteristics of a traditional financial instrument, including those like Bitcoin, Ether, and other various utility and exchange tokens, are not currently regulated. It is also prudent to note that even if a crypto asset is unregulated by the FCA, certain activities relating to or involving those crypto assets may trigger other regulatory regimes.

The prevailing sentiment appears to be indicating increasing regulation and oversight into the crypto sector, driven by concerns in relation to consumer protection, stability of the financial markets, and various financial scandals that have happened within the crypto sector in recent years. There is an ongoing consultation which proposes to bring crypto assets within the scope of existing legislation by considering them as a specified investment under the Financial Services and Markets Act (Regulated Activities) Order 2001. The consultation process remains underway, and its outcomes will significantly influence the future regulatory framework for crypto assets.

Conclusion

The landscape of crypto assets and their regulation is complex, rapidly evolving, and varies across jurisdictions. The implications for individual investors and crypto asset enterprises are substantial. The complexities of crypto assets covered in this article only scratch the surface, and it is essential to seek out expert advice in order to ensure that guidance is tailored to one’s situation.