Retail and Hospitality
Retail & Hospitality
Danny Schwarz, Sophie Levitt
September 2024
Director and Head of Commercial Real Estate, Danny Schwarz, and Solicitor Sophie Levitt discuss the potential impact of the proposed outdoor smoking ban on the hospitality sector, as well as the legal implications for landlords and tenants, in The Times.
Danny and Sophie’s article was published in The Times, 26 September 2024.
Ministers are considering imposing stricter rules on outdoor smoking to reduce the number of preventable deaths connected to tobacco use. There are no final plans, but smoking could be banned in pub gardens, outdoor restaurants and sports grounds.
The proposed ban appears as a puritanical tendency to reach for authoritarian solutions to complex public health problems. When politicians choose to cement their intolerance of the behaviour of others through legislation, it restricts individual freedom, further eroding people’s right to choose what they can do and where they can do it.
Arguably, such misuse of state control is antidemocratic: an extreme anti-smoking agenda which is not supported by scientific evidence that smoking in the open air creates any quantifiable threat to public health.
And now the British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) is pleading with the government to abandon plans for greater smoking restrictions in pubs since it would affect their viability as businesses. But not all pubs would be impacted equally by such a ban. For instance, gastropubs are less worried about a slowdown following the ban, given the focus of their business on serving full meals, typically indoors.
While there is some disagreement within the hospitality industry regarding the precise impact of such a ban, there is a broad consensus that beefed up rules need to be clearly worded and ‘outdoor area’ must be precisely defined to minimise uncertainty.
A pub garden smoking ban could affect both landlords and tenants. If the ban has a heavy impact on the viability of tenants’ businesses, they may be unable to generate enough income to pay their rent. Landlords may have to forfeit leases, leaving them with vacant possession and the need to remarket the property.
Tenants would be obliged to comply with the smoking ban, which could be outlined expressly in leases or implied under a compliance with laws clause. If the tenant used the property in a manner which was not permitted, the landlord could forfeit the lease and end the unlawful use. Alternatively, the landlord could claim damages if they suffered any loss because of the tenant’s breach.
While the government’s proposals have received support from public health experts, many landlords, operators and customers have voiced concern that the rules would be unenforceable.
Bar staff would have to police this ban in addition to their existing obligations. Smokers would crowd on pavements outside of pubs, which would cause disturbance and nuisance to neighbours, or breach licence conditions, particularly in residential areas. Smoking could also be prohibited in parks and therefore create confusion in public spaces as it would be difficult to police.
If you are needing advice on matters relating to the hospitality sector or the legal obligations of landlords and tenants in commercial real estate, please contact a member of our Commercial Real Estate team.