Search and find what you need faster.

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Danny Schwarz and Sophie Levitt discuss how the rise in NICs will affect property investors and landlords, in FT Adviser

Posted on: January 13th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Head of Commercial Real Estate Danny Schwarz and Solicitor Sophie Levitt discuss how the increased rate of employer Class 1 national insurance contribution rates will impact property investors and landlords.

Danny and Sophie’s article was published in FT Adviser, 13 January 2025.

NIC Rate Hike: UK businesses brace for landlord and tenant turmoil

Rachel Reeves presented her Autumn Budget 2024 to Parliament on 30 October, to a mixed reception. One of the most controversial changes announced was that the government will be increasing the rate of employer Class 1 National Insurance Contribution (NIC) rates from 13.8% to 15%. The current rate of 13.8% is payable on the amount that an employee’s earnings exceed the secondary threshold of £9,000 per year/£175 per week. However, the increased rate will be 15% and the secondary threshold will be reduced to £96 pounds per week/£5,000 per year. These changes to employers NIC rates will come into effect on 5 April 2025, however are already posing concerns for the UK’s retail and hospitality sector.

While the increase in employer NICs aims to raise revenue for vital services, such as the NHS, and may increase funding for contributory benefits, such as the State Pension, the measure could have a profound effect on retail and hospitality businesses due to the increasing costs such businesses face and may result in shop closures, and others feeling the strain.

As a result of these changes, it is vital that property investors and landlords consider how these measures will impact their buying strategies, and tenants may well consider renegotiating their lease agreements to offset the higher operational costs which may otherwise impact their businesses.

For landlords and tenants alike, these reforms pose a number of challenges.

Operational costs

The prospect of raising employer National Insurance costs could prove to be a major setback for businesses. As a result of these reforms, businesses could be forced to face higher operational costs due to increased NICs, which would reduce their profit margins and place a greater strain on their livelihoods. For instance, it has been estimated that Tesco alone could face a £1 billion pound increase in its National Insurance bill over the course of this parliament.

Smaller and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are expected to be the most severely impacted as a result of these changes. SMEs often operate on tighter profit margins and many such businesses will therefore be forced to decide whether to fund the higher NICs by operating on reduced profits, cutting back on expenses or increasing their prices.

As a result, a phased introduction of the NIC threshold may be a better way for businesses to absorb the costs without passing them on to consumers in the form of higher prices.

Price increases

If a retail business opted to increase their prices of goods and services to offset the higher costs, consumer spending and demand could also be impacted as a result of the NIC hikes. Higher prices could exacerbate the cost-of-living crisis, making everyday items more expensive for shoppers.

It therefore comes as no surprise that more than 70 of Britain’s largest retailers have signed an open letter to warn the Chancellor that the NIC hike may lead to price increases and job losses throughout the high street. Some of the signatories included Aldi, Lidl, Boots, Ocado, Morrisons, Greggs and JD Sports – all of whom share concerns about the viability of such proposals.

Lease agreements

Business tenants who face the higher operational costs from the increased NIC rates may also seek to renegotiate their lease terms as a result of these changes. This could potentially lead to more flexible or reduced rent agreements since landlords are likely to be reluctant to lose longstanding tenants and will want to avoid being left with vacant properties and no rental income.

There are several ways for landlords to offer incentives and concessions to tenants to help them through this new financial burden. Temporary rent reductions could help tenants manage their cash flow during challenging times. Landlords could otherwise offer reduced rent for early renewal, waive certain fees or provide additional services such as maintenance.

Consequently, the terms of the lease could be made more manageable for tenants.

Rent arrears

Moreover, under the strain of these measures, certain landlords may also be less willing to renegotiate their lease terms and tenants may struggle to absorb the additional costs. Tenants, particularly in the retail and hospitality sectors, may be unable to generate enough income to meet their rent obligations. This could lead to higher rates of tenant defaults, leaving landlords with no choice but to forfeit their leases and to re-market the property. If landlords were left with no rental income, this would place a further strain on their finances.

There would also be additional expenses including administrative costs and legal fees when dealing with tenant defaults.

The fact that the British Retail Consortium is seeking a meeting with the Chancellor to discuss their concerns about the increased NIC rates, is proof that the scale of the new costs has the potential to cause severe financial hardship across different businesses.

Property transactions

The hike in NIC rates could affect the overall cost structure of property transactions and lead to higher property prices for buyers and sellers. Buyers may face higher purchase prices, which can affect affordability and demand in the property market. This could create a more challenging environment for property transactions, with reduced demand leading to slower market activity. 

If property investors and developers must operate on reduced profit margins, therefore, certain projects may seem less attractive or viable. This could lead to a decrease in the number of new development projects.

Higher NIC rates would also likely lead to increased labour costs for property investors and developers. This would inevitably make construction and development projects more expensive, potentially leading to higher prices for new properties.

Additionally, higher costs may be reflected by the fees of the professionals who are involved in the development projects, such as surveyors, architects and contractors.

Reduced investment

With increased costs due to higher NIC rates, landlords and tenants may also reduce investments in property improvements, expansions, or new technology, potentially slowing growth and innovation in the sector. The NIC rate hike has the potential to exacerbate economic uncertainty and make buyers, sellers and investors more cautious.

It is highly likely, therefore, that the changes will affect the overall health of the property market and have a significant knock on effect on the UK’s retail and hospitality sector.

Potential for legal disputes

Unsurprisingly, therefore, changes implemented as a result of the Budget could lead to legal disputes over lease agreements, employment terms and other obligations as parties adjust to the new financial landscape. There is also potential for businesses to struggle to comply with these new NIC regulations, which could lead to disputes with HMRC over unpaid contributions or penalties for non-compliance.

It is vital that businesses stay updated with the latest NIC regulations to ensure that they remain complaint. Payroll systems will need to be reviewed and updated to reflect the changes in the NIC rates. Compliance will reduce the risk of disputes arising from regulatory issues and will ensure a smoother operation of business.

Navigating the increased secondary NIC liability

As a result of Reeves’ proposals, the UK government estimates that 940,000 employers will face an increased secondary NIC liability. It is therefore inevitable that businesses across the UK and especially SMEs are feeling the pressure of this financial burden. It is essential for businesses to consider a variety of cost saving measures and to save price increases and redundancies as a last resort.

Landlords must also take a balanced approach and agree to renegotiate their lease agreements with loyal tenants if it is reasonable to do so. Landlords may be able to offer more flexible payment plans or allow temporary reductions with the agreement to recoup the difference at a future date.

However, maintaining open and transparent communication is fundamental.

Landlords and tenants should discuss the financial challengers together to find mutually beneficial solutions. By adopting this strategy, landlords can help their tenants through financial hardship whilst maintaining occupancy and fostering positive landlord-tenant relationships.

Looking ahead

Unsurprisingly, the proposed NIC hikes has provided cause for concern for many UK businesses in the retail and hospitality industry. From the impact on operational costs to the risk of litigation, there are a plethora of factors that must be considered if businesses are to weather the storm and remain both profitable and compliant.

In order to navigate these choppy waters, it is therefore vital that businesses seek tailored legal advice concerning their employment obligations and property agreements to ensure that they are braced for the upcoming changes and able to tackle the issues head on.

For more information on our Commercial Real Estate services, please click here. For our services in the Retail and Hospitality sector, click here

 

Abtin Yeganeh comments on the Renters’ Rights Bill capping up-front payments for renters

Posted on: January 13th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Director and Head of Property Litigation Abtin Yeganeh comments on a new provision of the Renters’ Rights Bill making it illegal to ask tenants to pay more than one month’s rent plus a six-week deposit up front.

Abtin’s comments were published in Metro, 10 January 2025, and can be found here.

Will the new legislation work?

So, why have landlords been allowed to ask for such vast amounts upfront until now?

As Abtin Yeganeh, Director and Head of Real Estate Disputes at Lawrence Stephens tells Metro, landlords often use these hefty deposits for peace of mind when, for example, tenants might not have a UK-based guarantor.

‘In order to tackle issues of bad credit and/or renting to overseas individuals, landlords often seek rent in advance as additional financial security. This can amount to six months’ rent in advance,’ Abtin details.

But as he believes, we’ll have to wait and see how it pans out – and whether landlords listen to the details of enforcement.

‘The outcome of these reforms is that tenants should, in theory, have more options when it comes to securing rental properties as they will not have to compete with prospective tenants who can pay a lump sum in advance. 

‘However, given that landlords have a choice as to who they want to take on as a tenant, it remains to be seen whether the proposed changes have the desired effect.’

For more information on our Real Estate Disputes services, please click here

Emma Cocker comments on managing discrimination and harassment in the workplace

Posted on: January 9th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Senior Associate Emma Cocker comments on the legal action facing McDonald’s over allegations of widespread harassment and discrimination, and discusses employers’ obligations to protect their staff and workplace.

Emma’s comments were published in Business Matters Magazine, 7 January 2025, and can be found here.

“All employers have duties to protect their staff against discrimination and harassment in the workplace – obligations which apply regardless of whether people are engaged on a full-time, part-time or zero hours basis.

“However, with most McDonald’s workers being engaged on a zero hours basis, individuals will be acutely aware of their employment insecurity. They are also likely fearful of being subjected to detrimental treatment for raising complaints. The abuse which arises from the imbalance of power inherent in these types of workplace relationships can lead to significant liability for businesses, of which employers must be conscious.

“It would appear that McDonald’s still has a long way to go in providing a safe working environment free from discrimination and harassment. How they handle these claims will likely be carefully scrutinised. The longer businesses allow this kind of behaviour to persist, the longer the list of grievances and legal claims they will face.”

For more information on our Employment services, click here

Matt Green comments on the rise of Big Tech lawsuits in CDR Magazine

Posted on: January 7th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Head of Blockchain and Digital Assets and Technology Disputes Matt Green comments on the rise in litigation against Big Tech companies, and explores how regulation must adapt to provide better protection and recourse for consumers.

Matt’s comments were published in CDR Magazine, 6 January 2025.

“There have been very few useful regulatory protections for consumers, although attempts have been made under financial promotions regimes.

“There is a severe lack of protections for consumers broadly when dealing with crypto assets, particularly at retail exchanges. Under recent case law, the trend is to treat crypto exchanges like banks, which themselves are governed following hundreds of years of banking law with consumer protection in place. 

“However, these laws cannot be applied to crypto exchanges given technical and operational differences. On that basis, crypto exchanges are given wide protections for how they custody and pool assets (tilting in favour of their own interests), but consumers are left without recourse where those exchanges are unwilling to help.”

For more inforamtion on our regulatory services and crypto practice, please click here

Lawrence Stephens appoints specialist immigration lawyer to head new department

Posted on: January 7th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Leading full-service law firm Lawrence Stephens is pleased to announce the appointment of specialist immigration lawyer Skylar McKeith, who will head the firm’s new Immigration practice.

Skylar provides strategic advice to both corporate and private clients, and represents high-net-worth individuals and celebrities, high-profile business professionals, and companies.

Highlights of her work include securing a Global Talent visa for an Emmy Award-winning American actor, successfully obtaining Skilled Worker visas for employees of a renowned art gallery and securing a sponsor licence for a professional women’s football club – enabling the recruitment of international talent.

Skylar’s appointment also marks the launch of Lawrence Stephens’ new Immigration practice. Complementing the firm’s existing suite of services, the launch of this new department will allow Lawrence Stephens to continue to provide its wide range of clients with the very best in integrated legal advice.

Skylar is an active member of the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association and a regular commentator in the national press and across radio and television, contributing to media discussions around hot-button immigration issues.

Commenting on her appointment, Skylar said: “Lawrence Stephens is a dynamic firm which has grown significantly over the past few years, and I am delighted to join such a vibrant and acknowledged team of legal experts.

“I look forward to working closely with the firm’s existing departments to provide clients with a full suite of services.”

Steven Bernstein, Managing Director at Lawrence Stephens, commented: “We are excited to announce Skylar’s appointment and the formation of our new Immigration department, with her at its core.

 “It is a pleasure to welcome Skylar to the Lawrence Stephens team. Her combination of legal expertise with commercial advice and strategy will enable us to provide a more dynamic offering to clients.”

For more information on Lawrence Stephen’s Immigration practice, please click here

Lawrence Stephens expands its Real Estate Disputes team with appointment of Senior Associate Roberto Francis

Posted on: January 6th, 2025 by Natasha Cox

Leading dispute resolution firm, Lawrence Stephens, is pleased to announce the appointment of Roberto Francis as Senior Associate to its Real Estate Disputes team.

Roberto joins the firm with extensive experience acting for bridging and alternative lenders with a primary focus on secured and unsecured recoveries, which includes but is not limited to possession claims, receivership, insolvency and professional negligence.

Head of Real Estate Disputes, Abtin Yeganeh said “We’re delighted to welcome Roberto to our team. We’re certain that the breadth of his experience will enhance our service offering and enable us to continue delivering commercially focused, marketing-leading legal advice.”

William Bowyer comments on the significance of McLaren Racing’s $30m claim against Alex Palou 

Posted on: January 2nd, 2025 by Hugh Dineen-Lees

Associate and sports law specialist William Bowyer comments on how McLaren’s claim against Palou will likely set a precedent for similar F1 contract disputes going forward – it will either enable racing drivers to have greater choice with respect to moving teams, or discourage them from moving whilst still under contract.

William’s comments were published in City AM, 24 December 2024, and can be found here. 

“Given the value of the claim, the current profile of F1, the nature of a driver’s role within a race team and McLaren’s position in the sport, this is a hugely important sports law case and will likely set a precedent for similar F1 contract disputes going forward.

“Given the nature of this case, it will be interesting to see what the court considers – or does not consider – to be caused by Palou’s breach of contract and/or what is reasonably foreseeable regarding the losses claimed by McLaren. McLaren will be pushing for a wide range of losses to be considered from livery changes, new marketing spend, unforeseen spend on new drivers and loss of sponsorships.

“When a party breaches a contract, the “innocent” party (in this case McLaren) often has a right to an award of damages if they have come into loss as result of the breach. It is important to remember that the purpose of damages (from an English Law perspective) is to put the innocent party in the same position as if the contract had not been breached. Therefore, McLaren can only be awarded as much as the court considers necessary to reach that position. We often see scenarios where parties attempt to recover beyond what is necessary to place them back in that position.

 “Should the court side with McLaren, drivers would be discouraged from moving teams whilst still under contract based on their perceived chances of success, and help ensure that race teams hold the power.

“However, should the court consider the damages to be far lower than McLaren claims, racing drivers will likely breathe a sigh of relief. Whilst they would still have to pay damages for breaching a driving contract, it may enable them to have greater choice to choose teams based on the opportunities presented to them – if they consider the pros of switching teams whilst still under contract to be greater than the costs they may incur.

 “Importantly, McLaren’s dispute with Palou highlights the importance of drivers seeking tailored and sports-specific legal advice before signing any ‘seat deal’ – especially before a decision as big as changing teams.”

Lawrence Stephens advises Blue Shield Capital on their largest deal to date

Posted on: December 24th, 2024 by Hugh Dineen-Lees

Lawrence Stephens has advised Blue Shield Capital on an £18 million loan for a UK-based landlord and build-to-rent operator focused on city-centre rental properties. The loan was for their flagship property, a 119-unit BTR scheme in Liverpool City Centre, completed in 2023.

The 12-month facility, set at 69% LTV, is designed to assist the borrower in refinancing their existing debt and optimising their portfolio structure. This deal is the largest they have completed to date and is the latest in a number of fast-moving deals they have undertaken supported by our team.

Blue Shield Capital is a fast-growing property lending firm who provides flexible financing solutions for property owners and investors.

The team was led by Director and Head of Banking Ajoy Bose-Mallick, with support from Directors Ann Ebberson and Alex Edwards.

Ajoy commented: “We are delighted to have supported Blue Shield on their largest deals to date. We are pleased to have played our part in enabling Blue Shield to exceed its targets for 2024”.

Lawrence Stephens advises The Cotswold Company on the expansion of its omni-channel presence

Posted on: December 19th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

Lawrence Stephens has advised The Cotswold Company, the well-known premium furniture and homeware brand, on commercial contracts to support the expansion of its omni-channel presence through third party retailers. The company has launched its products on NEXT.co.uk and with John Lewis & Partners online, alongside the introduction of a dedicated brand space within the iconic Peter Jones store in Chelsea.

Founded in 1996, The Cotswold Company offers a range of thoughtfully designed furniture, with a focus on quality materials and craftsmanship. These contracts mark the brand’s first entry onto third-party retail platforms, complementing its fast-growing e-commerce site and 10 UK showrooms.

In a recent article in Retail Week, Cotswold Company chief executive Ralph Tucker said: “With our new partnerships with John Lewis Partnership and Next – both of which have gone live in time for Christmas – we’re making tangible steps towards delivering growth and becoming one of the UK’s leading premium homeware brands.”

Rachael Pinchbeck, Head of Commercial Finance, The Costwold Company said “Bradley and Craig were a pleasure to work with. Their contractual expertise and retail experience resulted in the smooth and timely completion of contracts ahead of our successful launches. We look forward to working with Bradley and the Lawrence Stephens team on future projects.”

Director Bradley Lee advised on the commercial contracts, while real estate advice was provided by Director Craig Mullen.

Joanne Leach, Emma Cocker and Becci Collins examine the government’s crackdown on foreign labour exploitation, in People Management

Posted on: December 19th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

Senior Associates Joanne Leach and Emma Cocker and Solicitor Becci Collins explore the government’s recently announced plans to tighten immigration systems, and discuss how this will impact employers and employees, in People Management.

Joanne, Emma and Becci’s article was published in People Management, 17 December 2024, and can be found here.

Government cracks down on foreign labour exploitation: what employers need to know

Emma Cocker, Joanne Leach and Becci Collins explain recently announced plans to tighten immigration systems, and how they will affect business that hire overseas talent.

On 28 November 2024, the government announced that it intends to tighten immigration worker systems by extending categories of breaches, as well as strengthening sanctions. In its pre-election manifesto, the government stated that it intended “to reduce net migration through proper control and management of the visa framework”. The proposed new rules are evident of the government’s intent to “crackdown on visa abuse and prevent exploitation”.

The government proposes extending the circumstances in which sanctions can be issued to companies that sponsor overseas workers, to include those who commit serious employment breaches. It is expected that this will include the reforms proposed in the Employment Rights Bill published in October, as well as existing rights, such as the entitlement to national minimum wage. However it is unclear how a company will be judged to be in breach of employment laws. Such a finding could potentially derive from a successful employment tribunal claim, or a new regulatory body may be tasked with assessing failure to comply with minimum standards.

The current sanctions available to enforcement officers in relation to companies held in breach of immigration laws can only be issued for a period of 12 months. For those who commit repeat offences, this period will be doubled to “at least” two years, suggesting there is a possibility of longer sanction periods.

There will also to be a new initiative to take pre-emptive action against those who are suspected of committing serious breaches.  Where there are already signs of rule breaking, the government intends to use action plans to bind businesses to take specified steps to improve and correct issues. Currently, action plans can be implemented for a period of three months. However, this is to be extended to 12 months. If the required improvements are not made, the sponsor’s licence will be revoked.

Tougher rules to prevent companies exploiting cheap foreign labour should be welcomed. Workforces are strengthened by the diversity brought to organisations by migrant workers and those individuals deserve not to be exploited. This issue is also addressed by proposals that intend to prohibit exploitation by passing on the costs of recruiting overseas workers to the individual, sometimes at a premium or excessive rate. These costs can result in individuals being left with unfair and unmanageable debts to their employers. The proposal to ban these practices will help to ensure that only businesses who genuinely require overseas workers – and can afford to recruit them in a fair and respectful way – benefit from the immigration system.

Prudent employers will take the recently published statistics as a warning, indicating how seriously the government takes the issues of tackling abuse and failing to adhere to the immigration system rules. For example:

  • In October 2024, there were 856 visits conducted to businesses suspected of employing illegal workers, a 55% increase on visits carried out in October 2023.
  • Between January and October 2024, more than 6,600 visits were made, a 22% increase on the same period in 2023.
  • Between January and October 2024, over 4,600 arrests were made, a 21% increase on the same period in 2023.

The government’s intention to expand the circumstances in which sanctions can be issued to include employment law breaches, and to extend the penalty from being banned from hiring overseas workers from one year to two, will shift the compliance landscape considerably. Further extending the power of Home Office officials to permanently withdraw a company’s sponsorship licence if they breach employment laws could have catastrophic consequences for businesses relying on an overseas workforce. However, it seems that the proposed expansion only applies to companies. It may be more effective to increase the sanctions on individuals who facilitate these breaches – perhaps further changes are to come before the draft legislation reaches parliament.

It is uncertain when we can expect this law to come into effect, but we shouldn’t expect this to be the final crackdown by the government. We may also see the reintroduction of the resident labour market test, or salary thresholds and visa fees being increased. Hopefully, the government will consult early as to how these changes may be implemented but, in the meantime, companies effectively have a grace period to get their house in order.

Companies should take an active approach to ensure compliance in all areas of employment and immigration law and they should do more than take a simple ‘tick box’ approach. Employers should review their policies and procedures to ensure they are up to date and meet minimum standards to avoid the above-mentioned sanctions, as well as the reputational damage and disruption to the running of a business held to be in breach of immigration and/or employment laws.

This announcement should serve as a wake-up call to all employers that they must comply with employment laws as well as immigration rules, otherwise they will face increasingly severe consequences of enforcement.

If you have any questions about the government’s plans and how you can ensure your business is complying with employment and immigration laws, please contact a member of the Employment team.

Matt Green co-authors chapter of The Founders’ Guide to UK Crypto Law

Posted on: December 16th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

Matt Green, Director and Head of Blockchain and Digital Assets at Lawrence Stephens has contributed to the launch of a new guide, The Founders’ Guide to UK Crypto Law by Lisa McClory, Digital Technologies Lead at D2 Legal Technology, an award-winning legal data consulting firm.

Matt’s co-author is Marcin Zarakowski, CEO of Token Recovery. In their chapter on ‘Tracing, Freezing and Recovery – when crypto assets are stolen‘, they explain the risks, and the legal procedures available to those affected.

The publication came about through the recognition of the urgent need for some solid and practical guidance for projects looking to start out in the Web3 space (the concept emphasising personal data ownership and the use of blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies).

The guide brings together many of the top experts in the area to deliver on this objective. It is intended as a starting point for Web3 builders and entrepreneurs in the UK. The guide acknowledges the important role that law and regulation play and seeks to assist projects in overcoming uncertainty, avoid pitfalls and generally equip the reader with the essential knowledge to empower and catalyse their ideas.

To read the guide please follow the link: The Founder’s Guide to UK.pdf – Google Drive

Lawrence Stephens prepares source of funds reports for property bought at auction using crypto assets

Posted on: December 16th, 2024 by Natasha Cox

Despite cyptocurrencies becoming more mainstream, recent commentary suggests that investors are still finding it hard to utilise these to purchase property in the UK. A recent Financial Times article highlighted the low appetite for sellers to accept cryptocurrencies. As a result, if purchasers want to use their crypto investments towards a property purchase, this usually involves converting the cryptocurrency into traditional or fiat currency – legal tender established by government regulation.

Much of the reluctance to accept funds derived from  the disposal of cryptocurrency comes from its well-publicised association with criminal activity, in particular money laundering. Law firms have obligations imposed by the SRA in relation to checking sources of wealth and sources of funds for anti-money laundering (AML) purposes. Solicitors have a legal duty to ensure that any, and all, funds used within a property transaction have come from a legitimate source. They must therefore establish the original source of the funds, not the mere availability of funds in a bank account.

Establishing the legitimacy of funds generated through cryptoasset activity requires the instruction of an expert who is able to carry out a full report on the crypto proceeds being used. The content of this report includes documenting and reporting of the cryptoasset activity, including the initial ‘on-ramp’ into crypto (i.e. the exchange of traditional fiat money into cryptoassets), the purchase of cryptoassets, and the subsequent cryptoasset activity to the ultimate liquidation and ‘off-ramp’ from cryptoassets back into traditional fiat money which was then being used to make the purchase. This report can then form the basis on which the conveyancer can make a judgment as to whether it is safe to proceed with the proposed transaction.

There are currently few law firms with the required expertise to produce such reports. Buyers wishing to use crypto assets for property purchases should be especially aware of the need to establish legal source of funds when buying property at auction.

The Lawrence Stephens’ team was recently called in at short notice to assist a client who had purchased a property for £210,000 at auction. He had intended to fund the purchase by utilising proceeds mainly generated through investing and trading on cryptoassets. Our client had instructed solicitors in relation to the purchase. However, just two days before the notice to complete was due to expire, the client was informed that they did not have the necessary expertise and could not provide the required report on the source of funds coming by way of crypto. At this late stage, he was at risk of losing his 10% deposit.

The Lawrence Stephens’ team were able to take on the instructions and were able to extend the notice to complete by three days. This gave the team enough time to complete a full crypto source of funds report to verify the funds coming by way of crypto and intended to be utilised for the purchase. We were pleased to effect the completion of the purchase within the agreed upon extended time.